It is time India realized the limits of its coercive diplomacy and advocated for South Asian regionalism instead of Indian exceptionalism. This blog, among many others, focuses on this particular topic.
In his third term as Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi continues to emphasize his "neighborhood first" policy. However, India's public remains largely unaware of its failures. The tendency of New Delhi commentators to adhere closely to the lines set by North Block and South Block means India's citizens do not get an accurate reading of what is happening next door, nor the repeated errors of their government.
The collapse of Sheikh Hasina's regime in Dhaka was a transformative moment for Bangladesh and represented an outright collapse of India's interventionist strategy. Rather than trying to spin the narrative about the student movement that ousted Hasina, labeling it pro-West, anti-Hindu, and Islamist, New Delhi should introspect on how it has handled relations with Bangladesh and the larger region. An honest review would point towards a new start in all arenas, from the standalone India-Pakistan relationship to the China paranoia that clouds perspectives on its smaller neighbors, and the activation of South Asian cooperation, including the SAARC organization.
On the whole, what we see is in-country bluster, overseas misadventures, and neighborhood interference. Hasina and her spiraling autocracy were spoon-fed and protected over three fraudulent elections by the Modi government until her rule became so brittle that it fell with a crash. Her escape helicopter was at the ready, she having understood that it was all or nothing when you become a foreign lackey—complete command or exile.
Rather than being a scaremonger and pointing fingers, India should look inwards and seek accountability for the Bangladesh embarrassment. The fraught situation was created by an unwillingness to understand the host society in the rush to secure concessions on river waters, transit, infrastructure, business interests, and more. Without India's heavy hand, Bangladesh would have remained a messy but standing democracy where leaders could join the parliamentary opposition rather than helicopter out.
India must realize the limits of its coercive diplomacy, remembering how the economic blockade of 2015 solidified anti-India suspicion in Nepal and how its collaboration with Hasina has now created deep-seated animus. Even as this piece was written, New Delhi, unable to read the pulse of cross-border societies, seeks to manufacture consent in Kathmandu to have its way with Nepal's waters.
India's Prime Minister Modi must clean his spectacles and look at neighbors anew with trust and transparency. New Delhi cannot plan its mega river-linking project involving massive reservoirs and canals within Nepal and Bhutan without consulting Kathmandu and Thimphu. It cannot demand rights as a lower riparian neighbor from Nepal and act as an upper riparian one with Bangladesh. You cannot have a home minister call Bangladeshis "termites" and not face consequences.
If New Delhi's leadership stopped badmouthing neighboring countries and desisted from ordering interference in their internal affairs, it would realize that the default setting of the surrounding peoples is friendship towards India. However, with ill-informed analysts, arrogant diplomats, and unaccountable spooks defining policy, things are bound to go awry. One corrective would be to ensure freedom of expression in India when it comes to discussions on external affairs. Pakistan should not be ostracized. How can a policy be "neighborhood first" when Pakistan, the largest and most significant neighbor, is completely erased from the radar? The country's utility for Modi is limited to ultra-nationalist histrionics and electoral gain.
No doubt, Pakistan's ruling establishment has played nasty with India over the years, but by no stretch of the imagination should it be ostracized to maintain a ready-made enemy. The Indian public is programmed into regarding the Pakistani state and Pakistan's people as one and the same. This means 236 million Baloch, Punjabi, Pashtun, Sindhi, and others are kept at arm's length. New Delhi actually sets back its own society and economy by doing so.
In terms of historicity, cross-border commerce, reduced military spending, and win-win cooperation would spark an upswing across South Asia. One would have expected the former Chief Minister of Gujarat to champion federalism, but Modi has presided over unprecedented centralization. The philosophy of this anti-federalist turn is guided by Hindu cartography, whose ultimate goal is not India, but a "Bharat." This much is evident in the mural that is up in the new Parliament building in New Delhi, incorporating territory from outside present-day India. It remains in place despite protests from neighboring capitals.
Modi's image in the neighborhood, seen from the outside, is weakening. The general election of 2024 started this trend, forcing him to mellow domestically. Will he also pull back on the policy of manipulating the internal affairs of smaller neighbors, or seek to maintain his populist hold by turning more aggressive? One way or another, South Asia as a whole is today more amenable to cooperation than a year ago, much of it predicated on independence from Indian coercion. Dhaka is no longer singing New Delhi's tune. The governments in Male and Kathmandu both now have leaders with the capacity to transparently debate Modi. Colombo's civil society seems mellowed by the Indian economic bailout, but a step too far is sure to trigger a reaction.
Modi landed in Thimphu in May to harangue the king and ruling class about China, but he did not make friends with the military. With the military on the back foot in Islamabad, there will be more opportunities for South Asian rapprochement as politicians get to call the shots. Afghanistan under the Taliban is an outlier, but in every other way, this is South Asia's moment, which must not be wasted for the upliftment of one-fourth of the world's people who live here. This demands that New Delhi play ball with the others.
New Delhi analysts fail to appreciate how keenly India watchers are following the country, and they see an India losing its shine and stature. New Delhi security analysts expended so much time and energy maintaining Pakistan as Enemy Number One that by the time they woke up to the northern adversary, it had created facts on the ground. In terms of military prowess, it is clear to everyone that India today comes a poor second to what it now considers its primary adversary, the People's Republic of China. This has become evident in the continuing Ladakh standoff, where India has reportedly lost 2,000 square kilometers of patrolling territory.
Although Beijing has little to boast about regarding human rights and pluralism, it has made significant strides across almost the entire socioeconomic and geopolitical spectrum. Beyond the military, from the size of its economy and industrial production to the volume of peer-reviewed scientific papers, the strength of its merchant navy, its human development index, and its diplomatic credibility, China has surged ahead in many areas. Meanwhile, India's own foreign presence through its embassies has been grievously impacted in the Modi era.
There was once a time when confident and expansive ambassadors represented a working democracy and cited Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, and the Panchsheel principles. The entire foreign affairs edifice is now diverted to burnishing Modi's international image and supporting the domestic political calculations of the BJP and the RSS. Ambassadors and high commissioners are no longer able to make contact across the political horizon, subdued as they are by the directive to propagate the Hindutva nationalist agenda. Their careers may be on the line if they do not organize at least a pranayam session when International Yoga Day rolls around.
Western leaders fawning over Modi have contributed to his in-country image thus far, besides the proactive hugs he foists upon his hosts. If only the Indian populace realized that the West's red carpet is not rolled out for India's achievements in governance and the economy, but primarily because of its large population as a market for goods and services and its potential role as a buffer against a rising China.
In his address at the last SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation) Summit in Kathmandu in 2014, Modi said, "The bonds will grow through SAARC or outside it, among us all or some of us." His intention was clearly to energize groupings beyond SAARC and without Pakistan, such as BBIN (Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal) and BIMSTEC (Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation). The SAARC Charter states that bilateral matters shall not be addressed within the organization, and India violates this stricture by refusing to attend the slated summit in Islamabad.
If the goal of SAARC is to promote peace, economic growth, and social justice for the entire subcontinent, India would be the main per capita beneficiary as the largest country. For their part, the neighbors wish for democracy and growth in India because the region as a whole can only rise together. India's stagnation will impact the far corners of the region.
It has long been the case that South Asian collaboration through SAARC is held hostage by the New Delhi-Islamabad relationship. Years of diplomacy and track-two efforts suddenly collapse with one terrorist action emanating from Pakistan. The Indian side must understand the need to compartmentalize. As with the difference between the Pakistani people and the state, India should distinguish between the political leaders of Pakistan and the deep state managed by military intelligence, not to forget the fundamentalist groupings.
To begin with, New Delhi should develop cross-empathy and think South Asian for its own sake. But India's monopoly over the direction of foreign policy means that cross-border connectivity and bonding are not given a chance, be it Sindh-Rajasthan, Punjab-Punjab, or Northeast-Bangladesh. If not for the fear of being trolled into oblivion, India's economists would be proposing access to Pakistan's vast market for Indian industry and services.
The moment New Delhi decides to turn over a new leaf and become an enthusiast for South Asian regionalism instead of Indian exceptionalism, we will be able to plan for a collective future. The problems of the Anthropocene are already upon us in this massively populated and vulnerable region, with borders meaningless vis-à-vis the challenges we face: air pollution, water scarcity, sand mining, plastic waste, mass migration, species and habitat losses, dangerous vectors, and the search for social justice through local governance, economic growth, and equity.
It is absurd for New Delhi's think tanks to believe that India can go it alone. India can hardly claim global leadership when its regional relationships are in disarray. The security analysts never refer to it, but South Asia contains two nuclear countries. In an era of fake news and AI bots, when chaos can be generated from thin air, it is best to have interstate relationships in order with failsafe mechanisms suited to the times, because nuclear fallout for sure does not know national boundaries.
Modi's understanding of South Asian regionalism is as a cumulative of bilateral relationships, which defeats the purpose. His self-serving regional xenophobia hurts India more than others. As the largest centrally located country with the world's largest concentration of the outright poor in the Ganga-Brahmaputra Basin, a dose of humility that comes from thinking of the margins would benefit New Delhi as it drafts a new South Asia engagement policy.
Under Modi's watch, India is no longer the exemplar of democracy and governance it was after independence. The neighbors have watched the derailment of Indian democracy and governance, as evident in the state's silence in the face of attacks against its Muslim citizens in the past few years. They have observed the mayhem brought by the unwarranted demonetization, the abrupt COVID lockdown, the Agnipath recruitment scheme, and the consequent fear of a weakened military, the rise of billionaires, and the electoral bonds scam.
If India were to comport itself as a South Asian country rather than as a regional commissar, it would not go apoplectic when Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Maldives, or Sri Lanka decide to deal independently with China. The neighbors are no pushovers for Beijing, but India's coercive diplomacy will definitely make more space for China. India's largest trading partner is now China, as it relies on Chinese supplies to run large parts of its economy. The China-India economic embrace is so tight that New Delhi would be better off worrying about this close relationship rather than a "necklace of pearls" conspiracy being hatched between Beijing and neighboring capitals.
It does seem that New Delhi, unable to seat itself at the global high table, wants to be the regional hegemon. We await the day when New Delhi begins to see that South Asian peace and collaboration will help its own economic rise, improve its global positioning, and benefit its peripheral regions from Rajasthan through Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and the northeastern states. New Delhi may be smug in its insularity, but the foreign policy it is currently marshalling does not seem to be on behalf of all of India.
Penned By Kanak Mani Dixit. He is a writer and journalist, as well as a civil rights and democracy activist. He is the founding editor of Himal South Asian magazine and an active campaigner for subcontinental regionalism.
Source:
(1) Indian foreign minister promises to ‘behave himself’ on rare Pakistan visit. https://news.yahoo.com/news/indian-foreign-minister-promises-behave-122948408.html.
(2) Jaishankar’s Islamabad visit for SCO: How India’s foreign policy has outgrown its Pakistan fixation. https://www.firstpost.com/opinion/jaishankars-islamabad-visit-for-sco-how-indias-foreign-policy-has-outgrown-its-pakistan-fixation-13823278.html.
(3) Diplomatic Steps: A New Chapter in India-Pakistan Relations?. https://www.devdiscourse.com/article/politics/3113473-diplomatic-steps-a-new-chapter-in-india-pakistan-relations.
(4) India–Pakistan relations - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India%E2%80%93Pakistan_relations.
(5) Conflict Between India and Pakistan | Global Conflict Tracker. https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/conflict-between-india-and-pakistan.
(6) Timeline: 75 years of partition and India-Pakistan tensions. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/8/12/timeline-75-years-of-partition-and-india-pakistan-tensions.
(7) South Asian Regionalism: The Limits of Cooperation. https://academic.oup.com/policy-press-scholarship-online/book/42941.
(8) Regional Cooperation in South Asia: Exploring the Three Pillars of .... https://worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/S2717541320500084.
(9) Conclusion - South Asian Regionalism - Cambridge University Press .... https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/south-asian-regionalism/conclusion/698CBECCB0FB243451EE97EC7AB3E650.
(10) South Asian Regionalism - De Gruyter. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.56687/9781529205169/html.
{fullWidth}